Models
Home » » love quotes hindi

love quotes hindi

Written By muthmmuuuaaanniish on Sunday, June 19, 2011 | 1:05 AM

images Quotes. emo love quotes love quotes hindi. hairstyles love quotes hindi.
  • hairstyles love quotes hindi.



  • pcs
    01-16 12:47 PM
    Siva,

    Thanks for listening to the request of lazy guys like me ( who cooled off after making intial contributions )

    I will shoot some more on happy occasions like my Kid's birth day etc...





    wallpaper hairstyles love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi.
  • love quotes hindi.



  • sivakumar
    02-22 01:48 PM
    thanks GCwaitforever I just wish that after april you change your name to GCRecivedFinally :->





    love quotes hindi. Quotes In Hindi
  • Quotes In Hindi



  • richi121175
    01-17 02:19 PM
    I tried to send you something in a private msg but your quota is fullShameless creatures, not even a single guy came and blasted me out for such comments ..! This means that I am telling the truth. You guys don't even have any self dignity left to come and face off with me.
    :mad: :mad:





    2011 love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. quotes hindi. love quotes
  • quotes hindi. love quotes



  • nat23
    06-12 03:01 PM
    I think the whole discussion can be summed up in the following manner: The CIR in its present form does more harm to us than good. If we can manage to get a favourable amendment attached then we are in good shape else we are in trouble.

    People might approach the issue in different ways:some might want to take a chance and work on it to get an admendment and some might not want to support it fearing an amendment wont be possible.



    more...


    love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. sad love
  • love quotes hindi. sad love



  • delax
    07-13 09:49 AM
    go figure..u jacko.. this forum is not give publicty to lawyers.
    pls close this thread


    Appreciate your comment - :) A healthy debate is beyond your reach and the ability to appreciate another view point seems to be completely missing. The last time I checked a forum is precisely for that - I am not defending or promoting anybody - Please - lets stick to Gandhian principles when we deal with each other not just with USCIS :)





    love quotes hindi. Short Sad Love Quotes In Hindi
  • Short Sad Love Quotes In Hindi



  • amitjoey
    01-18 10:59 AM
    I have been visiting this forum for a while now. I appreciate all the efforts being done by the Core team. I just signed for $20/- recurring contribution through paypal.

    MP70

    Thanks MP70. Please continue to educate your friends and urge everybody to contribute atleast $20/month.



    more...


    love quotes hindi. Love Quotes; Love SMS;
  • Love Quotes; Love SMS;



  • fatboysam
    12-25 10:20 AM
    I will like to know if a person on L2 visa with EAD can open new company in US ?





    2010 Quotes In Hindi love quotes hindi. Quotes. emo love quotes
  • Quotes. emo love quotes



  • h1techSlave
    02-04 12:07 PM
    Mirage, thanks a ton for taking this up and for amc for providing some very thoughtful analysis on the whole thing. I also appreciate the very critical comments from folks like senthil et. el. It is nice that you guys are criticizing the efforts right now so that we can tackle those issues and move forward.

    I am seeing enough enthusiasm for this effort. Let us move forward with this.



    more...


    love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. cute quotes
  • love quotes hindi. cute quotes



  • Macaca
    01-30 07:11 PM
    Unpaid bench means you are "Out of Status". Not illegal.


    I have never heard USCIS penalizing unpaid bench. If it a problem and such a common case, why don't we ever hear about penalty against unpaid bench?

    Is it possible to take unpaid leave every year?

    In teaching you have an option of not teaching in summer. This means you do not get 2-3 pay checks; happens every year because most faculty don't teach in summer. Faculty is not even aware that absence of pay checks can be a problem.





    hair quotes hindi. love quotes love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi.
  • love quotes hindi.



  • anilsal
    12-13 12:44 AM
    I still cannot understand why they do not allow one to file I-485 when the visa numbers are not current. Atleast 485 will give the person an opportunity to obtain a EAD card.

    If not, the person is in a limbo.



    more...


    love quotes hindi. sad love quotes hindi. love
  • sad love quotes hindi. love



  • yabadaba
    07-24 02:15 PM
    jc menon...have u ever taken a law class? do u have a jd? why are u then so adamant on thinking u "found" the loophole?

    we are not stupid morons over here. Neither is the AILA/millions of lawyers that are associated with immigration law. Please for heaven sake dont start now about some conspiracy theory about immigration lawyers having a preference for backlog.

    there is no loophole, there is no precedent and by emailing the director with a moronic question will only show that probably that we have morons stuck in retrogression and probably we deserve to be stuck.





    hot love quotes hindi. sad love love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. love quotes
  • love quotes hindi. love quotes



  • Ramba
    07-04 07:25 PM
    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.



    more...


    house love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. Sad Love Quotes In Hindi
  • Sad Love Quotes In Hindi



  • eb3_nepa
    02-14 12:50 PM
    Retrohatao,

    The point we are trying to make is, that we want to make the GC process ENTIRELY simple. There are various stages at which the applications are getting stuck right now. Labour, 485, Name check etc.

    Just to confirm, i am not comparing anything to anything. Even the plight of the spouses not being able to work and kids aging out is equally distressing to the person on whom it has befallen upon. Just like you feel despair with the Name check we all feel an equal amount if not more despair at our various issues. When i said "sub issue" i mean it is ONE of the many issues that is obstructing the path to the Green card.

    We appreciate that you brought the name check clearance to our notice as some of us were not aware that it was a problem. But please, for everyone's sake, do not compare 2 situations. We are all in this mess together and together we shall rise from it. For that we need to be united. :)





    tattoo Short Sad Love Quotes In Hindi love quotes hindi. Sad Love Quotes In Hindi
  • Sad Love Quotes In Hindi



  • va_labor2002
    07-25 08:34 PM
    Bkarnik,
    So did you ever get to contact aila. Or is there anybody who has contacts with aila taken up this issue with them?
    May be, everybody should contact their personal attorney and ask this question. We will see what their responses. If it is positive ,we can definitely contact USCIS and ask for clarifications.

    I am going to contact my attorney about this question.



    more...


    pictures Love Quotes; Love SMS; love quotes hindi. wallpaper sad love quotes
  • wallpaper sad love quotes



  • pappu
    12-26 03:41 PM
    6. If your visa is expired as mine is (btw a feb date has never opened up anywhere in India to date...i'm sick and tired and frustrated....getting an appt is a major hassle) the you better choose your airline carefully, the French embassy demands personal appearance (350 miles) for the 10 min it takes to issue a visa- which then lets me walk from one gate to another at De Gaulle.....
    So if you travel to India and change planes in Paris you need a transit visa!!
    What other countries do that and what countries allow without the visa? this information will be helpful.





    dresses love quotes hindi. love quotes love quotes hindi. good morning quotes in hindi.
  • good morning quotes in hindi.



  • ramus
    07-02 08:20 PM
    Just 700 so far.. Don't seem like we will be even close to 5000 by 10...

    Members who contributed please ask others to contribute now..



    more...


    makeup love quotes hindi. cute quotes love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi.
  • love quotes hindi.



  • srkamath
    07-18 03:17 PM
    I complied the list from visa stastistics website
    http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_1476.html

    example 2007 numbers from
    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY07AnnualReportTableVp2.pdf

    2006 numbers from
    http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY06AnnualReportTableV-Part2.pdf

    This is simply the best data i have ever seen an IV member dig out in the last 2 years.. Great Job sachug22





    girlfriend Sad Love Quotes In Hindi love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. love quotes
  • love quotes hindi. love quotes



  • fcres
    07-24 05:08 PM
    Good for you!
    How he is going to send means waiting till RN or send without RN.
    Please confirm.

    I have RN, i'm a June filer





    hairstyles sad love quotes hindi. love love quotes hindi. love quotes hindi. love quotes
  • love quotes hindi. love quotes



  • kramesh_babu
    07-27 10:40 AM
    Everest Consulting Group Inc is really good. I know them personally for more than 10 years now & they do what they say and do NOT torture their employees like many other consulting firms. I just got my GC thru them :)

    I hope this helps somebody & please let me know if I can be any further help!

    Thanks.
    Ramesh.





    immique
    07-03 01:42 AM
    I've said it before and I'll say it again - I don't see how the per country limit is unfair! It was set up so that immigrants from ALL nations would have EQUAL opportunity to immigrate to the U.S. and to prevent any one (or two) countries from monopolizing the visa numbers. Getting rid of the per country limit would most certainly lead to immigration from a limited number of sources (countries) and thus jeopardize the diversity of the immigration process. Getting rid of it would be like robbing Peter to pay Paul because those countries who are severely retrogressed now would only see limited benefits and those who are not all that retrogressed would fall backwards - is that fair!? It seems these forms are dominated by "certain" groups who have their own agenda and don't really care about ROW! It makes me feel uncomfortable being an IV member from ROW!

    how can you argue that quota system in EB categories is fair when there is no quota system in H1 visas? do you really think it is fair that a person from retrogressed country wait for 7-10 years in the same category or even a higher EB category when a similar person in other countries see their application cleared in a few months. just imagine yourself being in the less favorable/retrogressed category. EB system is based on qualifications and not the country of Origin. I don't have any issue regarding diversity. diversity is good but I don't think penalizing qualified individuals from a few countries just based on the country of Origin bodes well for the future of immigration especially when US is trying to attract high skilled immigrants.





    chanduv23
    09-10 10:40 AM
    The live updates are now available on IV chat.

    Please logon to
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/misc.php?do=cchatbox



    Share this article :

    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Search This Blog

    Powered by Blogger.
     
    Support : Copyright © 2014. Hd Wallpapers 2011